2004 Acura EL vs. 1975 TVR M
To start off, 2004 Acura EL is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 TVR M would be higher. At 1,668 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura EL weights approximately 287 kg more than 1975 TVR M.
Because 1975 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura EL | 1975 TVR M | |
Make | Acura | TVR |
Model | EL | M |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2290 mm |