2004 Acura EL vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Acura EL is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (123 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 138 kg more than 2004 Acura EL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura EL. (155 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura EL | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Acura | Oldsmobile |
Model | EL | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2680 mm |