2004 Acura EL vs. 1988 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2004 Acura EL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1988 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 768 kg more than 2004 Acura EL.
Because 1988 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura EL | 1988 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | EL | Brougham |
Year Released | 2004 | 1988 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3090 mm |