2004 Acura EL vs. 1994 Alpina B6
To start off, 2004 Acura EL is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Alpina B6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Alpina B6 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Alpina B6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Alpina B6 weights approximately 163 kg more than 2004 Acura EL.
Because 1994 Alpina B6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Alpina B6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura EL | 1994 Alpina B6 | |
Make | Acura | Alpina |
Model | EL | B6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |