2004 Acura EL vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 2004 Acura EL is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 420 would be higher. At 1,992 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Rover 420 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura EL (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Rover 420 weights approximately 7 kg more than 2004 Acura EL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Rover 420 (184 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura EL. (155 Nm). This means 1998 Rover 420 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura EL | 1998 Rover 420 | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | EL | 420 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1189 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2750 mm |