2004 Acura EL vs. 2000 Vector RD 180
To start off, 2004 Acura EL is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Vector RD 180. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Vector RD 180 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Vector RD 180 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Vector RD 180 (180 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2004 Acura EL. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Vector RD 180 should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura EL.
Because 2000 Vector RD 180 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Vector RD 180. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Vector RD 180 (175 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura EL. (155 Nm). This means 2000 Vector RD 180 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura EL | 2000 Vector RD 180 | |
Make | Acura | Vector |
Model | EL | RD 180 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 155 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2390 mm |