2004 Acura EL vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura EL would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2004 Acura EL. (124 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura EL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura EL. (155 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura EL | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Acura | Renault |
Model | EL | Megane |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1668 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |