2004 Acura MDX vs. 1957 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2004 Acura MDX is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 5,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1957 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (325 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2004 Acura MDX. (265 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura MDX.
Because 2004 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1957 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Cadillac Eldorado (543 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura MDX. (343 Nm). This means 1957 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura MDX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura MDX | 1957 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | MDX | Eldorado |
Year Released | 2004 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 5973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 325 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 543 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 75 L |