2004 Acura MDX vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2004 Acura MDX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura MDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura MDX (265 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura MDX weights approximately 885 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura MDX (343 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2004 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura MDX | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Acura | Holden |
| Model | MDX | EJ |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3472 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2019 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |
