2004 Acura MDX vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2004 Acura MDX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,474 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura MDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura MDX (265 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura MDX weights approximately 861 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura MDX (343 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm). This means 2004 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura MDX | 1995 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Acura | Rover |
| Model | MDX | 200 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3474 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 265 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
