2004 Acura MDX vs. 1999 Audi S8
To start off, 2004 Acura MDX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi S8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi S8 would be higher. At 4,170 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Audi S8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura MDX (265 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1999 Audi S8. (247 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi S8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura MDX weights approximately 296 kg more than 1999 Audi S8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura MDX (343 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Audi S8. (330 Nm). This means 2004 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Audi S8.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura MDX | 1999 Audi S8 | |
Make | Acura | Audi |
Model | MDX | S8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3474 cc | 4170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 330 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 21.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 13.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 90 L |