2004 Acura MDX vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura MDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura MDX would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura MDX (265 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura MDX. (343 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura MDX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura MDX | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | MDX | E-250 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 132 L |