2004 Acura MDX vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura MDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura MDX would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura MDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura MDX (265 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (151 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura MDX weights approximately 469 kg more than 2009 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura MDX (343 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (148 Nm). This means 2004 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura MDX | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | MDX | 5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2019 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |