2004 Acura MDX vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura MDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura MDX would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura MDX (265 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2004 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura MDX (343 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2004 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura MDX | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | MDX | E-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3472 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 343 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 57 L |