2004 Acura MDX vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura MDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura MDX would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura MDX (265 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2012 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden UTE.
Because 2004 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura MDX (343 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 2004 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura MDX | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | Acura | Holden |
Model | MDX | UTE |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3474 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 265 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 343 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |