2004 Acura NSX vs. 1952 Allard K2
To start off, 2004 Acura NSX is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura NSX (290 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura NSX weights approximately 230 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura NSX | 1952 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Acura | Allard |
| Model | NSX | K2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
