2004 Acura NSX vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Acura NSX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura NSX (249 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 690 kg more than 2004 Acura NSX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura NSX | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | NSX | 62 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 6389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 249 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |