2004 Acura NSX vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Acura NSX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura NSX (290 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 645 kg more than 2004 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura NSX | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | NSX | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
