2004 Acura NSX vs. 1989 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Acura NSX is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,228 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 112 kg more than 2004 Acura NSX.
Because 1989 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura NSX | 1989 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Acura | Jeep |
| Model | NSX | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 4228 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1542 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 57 L |
