2004 Acura NSX vs. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2004 Acura NSX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura NSX (290 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (185 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 218 kg more than 2004 Acura NSX.

Because 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee (305 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura NSX. (304 Nm). This means 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura NSX.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Acura NSX 1996 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Acura Jeep
Model NSX Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2004 1996
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 3179 cc 3963 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 290 HP 185 HP
Torque 304 Nm 305 Nm
Engine Bore Size 93 mm 98.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 78 mm 86.6 mm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1430 kg 1648 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4490 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1650 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 87 L