2004 Acura NSX vs. 1999 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2004 Acura NSX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B2500 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura NSX (290 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1999 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 310 kg more than 2004 Acura NSX.
Because 1999 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura NSX (304 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm). This means 2004 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura NSX | 1999 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | NSX | B2500 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 304 Nm | 194 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2990 mm |