2004 Acura NSX vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2004 Acura NSX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura NSX (290 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 526 kg more than 2004 Acura NSX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura NSX. (304 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura NSX | 2000 GMC Safari | |
Make | Acura | GMC |
Model | NSX | Safari |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 304 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2830 mm |