2004 Acura NSX vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2004 Acura NSX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura NSX (290 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (206 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile weights approximately 130 kg more than 2004 Acura NSX.
Because 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Acura NSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura NSX. (304 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura NSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura NSX | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | Acura | Oldsmobile |
| Model | NSX | Profile |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 304 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2880 mm |
