2004 Acura NSX vs. 2001 Lancia Nea

To start off, 2004 Acura NSX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura NSX (249 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura NSX weights approximately 80 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura NSX. (285 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura NSX.

Compare all specifications: