2004 Acura NSX vs. 2006 BMW 325
To start off, 2006 BMW 325 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura NSX would be higher. At 2,997 cc, 2006 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura NSX (249 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2006 BMW 325. (215 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura NSX (285 Nm @ 5300 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 325. (251 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2004 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura NSX | 2006 BMW 325 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | NSX | 325 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 2997 cc |
Horse Power | 249 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5300 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 85.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 87.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 61 L |