2004 Acura NSX vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura NSX would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura NSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura NSX (290 HP) has 191 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura NSX should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2004 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura NSX (304 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2004 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura NSX | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | NSX | Aveo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 304 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 46 L |