2004 Acura NSX vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura NSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura NSX would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura NSX weights approximately 185 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2004 Acura NSX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Acura NSX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura NSX (304 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Acura NSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura NSX | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Acura | Mini |
| Model | NSX | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 304 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3734 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |
