2004 Acura RSX vs. 1952 Alvis TB 21
To start off, 2004 Acura RSX is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1952 Alvis TB 21. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1952 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Alvis TB 21 (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura RSX. (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Alvis TB 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura RSX | 1952 Alvis TB 21 | |
| Make | Acura | Alvis |
| Model | RSX | TB 21 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 192 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |
