2004 Acura RSX vs. 1967 Renault 4
To start off, 2004 Acura RSX is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1967 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura RSX weights approximately 572 kg more than 1967 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura RSX | 1967 Renault 4 | |
Make | Acura | Renault |
Model | RSX | 4 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 38 L |