2004 Acura RSX vs. 1972 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 2004 Acura RSX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Cadillac Calais. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Cadillac Calais would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Cadillac Calais (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2004 Acura RSX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 908 kg more than 2004 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura RSX | 1972 Cadillac Calais | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | RSX | Calais |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 2130 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3310 mm |
