2004 Acura RSX vs. 2002 Jaguar X400
To start off, 2004 Acura RSX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar X400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 2004 Acura RSX. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 578 kg more than 2004 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 333 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura RSX. (192 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura RSX. 2002 Jaguar X400 has automatic transmission and 2004 Acura RSX has manual transmission. 2004 Acura RSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar X400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura RSX | 2002 Jaguar X400 | |
Make | Acura | Jaguar |
Model | RSX | X400 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 525 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 69 L |