2004 Acura TL vs. 1957 Aston Martin DBR2
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Aston Martin DBR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 (311 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2004 Acura TL. (267 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura TL.
Because 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Aston Martin DBR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1957 Aston Martin DBR2 | |
Make | Acura | Aston Martin |
Model | TL | DBR2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1957 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 4164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 86 L |