2004 Acura TL vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (267 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 617 kg more than 2004 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura TL | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | TL | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 5979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 2195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3300 mm |
