2004 Acura TL vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,382 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1959 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1959 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 546 kg more than 2004 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | TL | 62 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 6382 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1579 kg | 2125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 79 L |