2004 Acura TL vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (267 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 497 kg more than 2004 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura TL | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | TL | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3210 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 79 L |
