2004 Acura TL vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura TL weights approximately 639 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (324 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | TL | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 133 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1579 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 57 L |