2004 Acura TL vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura TL weights approximately 691 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (324 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Acura | Riley |
Model | TL | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 83 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1579 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 25 L |