2004 Acura TL vs. 1970 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1970 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1970 Cadillac Sixty. (228 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1970 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 617 kg more than 2004 Acura TL.
Because 1970 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1970 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | TL | Sixty |
Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1579 kg | 2196 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3390 mm |