2004 Acura TL vs. 1972 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura TL weights approximately 259 kg more than 1972 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1972 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1972 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | TL | 240 C |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1579 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |