2004 Acura TL vs. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura TL weights approximately 98 kg more than 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2004 Acura TL has manual transmission. 2004 Acura TL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1979 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Acura | Oldsmobile |
Model | TL | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 3788 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2760 mm |