2004 Acura TL vs. 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura TL weights approximately 559 kg more than 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta.
Because 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1982 Alfa Romeo Alfetta | |
Make | Acura | Alfa Romeo |
Model | TL | Alfetta |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 1569 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1579 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2260 mm |