2004 Acura TL vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (267 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura TL weights approximately 468 kg more than 1983 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (323 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Ford Tempo. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | TL | Tempo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |