2004 Acura TL vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (267 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura TL weights approximately 808 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (323 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Acura | Zastava |
Model | TL | 102 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2160 mm |