2004 Acura TL vs. 1990 Mini MK V
To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Mini MK V would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (267 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1990 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1990 Mini MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura TL weights approximately 953 kg more than 1990 Mini MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (323 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Mini MK V. (70 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Mini MK V.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 1990 Mini MK V | |
Make | Acura | Mini |
Model | TL | MK V |
Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 70 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2040 mm |