2004 Acura TL vs. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30

To start off, 2004 Acura TL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (267 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 weights approximately 17 kg more than 2004 Acura TL.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (323 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 has automatic transmission and 2004 Acura TL has manual transmission. 2004 Acura TL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: