2004 Acura TL vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, both 2004 Acura TL and 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 1061 kg more than 2004 Acura TL.
Because 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Acura TL | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
| Make | Acura | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | TL | 100 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3201 cc | 8998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 84.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1579 kg | 2640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 80 L |
