2004 Acura TL vs. 2005 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2005 Chrysler 300 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Acura TL (267 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 237 kg more than 2004 Acura TL.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (323 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 2005 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Acura | Chrysler |
Model | TL | 300 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 258 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 68 L |