2004 Acura TL vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 827 kg more than 2004 Acura TL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (323 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | TL | Livina |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 323 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 52 L |