2004 Acura TL vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Acura TL weights approximately 44 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Acura TL (324 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | TL | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 324 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 82.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1579 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |