2004 Acura TL vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Acura TL. (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2004 Acura TL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 387 kg more than 2004 Acura TL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Acura TL. (324 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Acura TL | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | TL | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3201 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 324 Nm | 366 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1579 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 76 L |